Skip to main content
Texas Hemp Reporter
  • News
  • Magazines
  • Texas Hemp Show
  • Advertising
  • Distribution
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Business
  • News
  • CBD
  • Podcast
  • Health
  • Business
  • Legislative
  • Cannabis News
  • Pop Culture
  • Lab Testing
  • Agriculture
Texas Hemp Reporter
  • News
  • Magazines
  • Texas Hemp Show
  • Advertising
  • Distribution
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Business
  • News
  • CBD
  • Podcast
  • Health
  • Business
  • Legislative
  • Cannabis News
  • Pop Culture
  • Lab Testing
  • Agriculture

Author: Jay Maguire

Texas SB 3 Hearing: Industry Advocates Challenge “Reefer Madness” Tactics…

Written by Jay Maguire on March 7, 2025. Posted in Legislative.

‘Reefer Madness’ Rhetoric vs. Industry Response

A contentious Texas Senate hearing on Senate Bill 3 (SB 3) – a proposal to ban all consumable forms of THC – erupted into a fierce debate between prohibition advocates and a broad coalition of industry experts, medical patients, and veterans calling for sensible regulation rather than outright prohibition. The March 3, 2025 Senate State Affairs Committee hearing pitted Senator Charles Perry (R-Lubbock) and Chief Steve Dye of the Allen Police Department against hemp industry representatives who accused SB 3’s backers of employing intellectual dishonesty and fear-mongering rhetoric reminiscent of “Reefer Madness” propaganda.
From the outset, Sen. Perry and Chief Dye set a dire tone. Perry blasted the hemp industry as untrustworthy and accused it of exploiting legal loopholes “to the point that it has endangered public health.” He asserted that “high-potency synthetic THC products have flooded the marketplace,” deliberately conflating Delta-8 THC (a naturally occurring cannabinoid typically synthesized from legal CBD) with truly synthetic drugs like K2/Spice. By branding Delta-8 a “synthetic THC,” Perry implied it is on par with those dangerous street drugs – a misleading equivalence that industry advocates repeatedly challenged.
Chief Dye amplified this alarm, representing a coalition of law enforcement groups supporting the ban. He cited undercover operations in his city that supposedly found some “hemp” products with THC levels up to 78% – far above the 0.3% legal limit. Dye warned senators that product labels “do not reflect” actual contents, leading to “accidental intoxications, overdoses and increased addiction…particularly in our youth.” This choice of words – invoking overdoses and youth addiction – appeared calculated to provoke fear of a looming public health disaster.

Industry Advocates Call for Regulation Over Prohibition

Industry representatives, veterans, and medical patients united in opposition to the ban, emphasizing that regulation rather than prohibition would better serve public interests. Among them was Jay Maguire of the Texas Hemp Federation, alongside numerous business owners and cannabis advocates who presented a united front against SB 3.
Multiple witnesses highlighted the choice lawmakers face: continuing to allow access to regulated hemp products or pushing demand underground. As the Texas Hemp Reporter’s own Jay Maguire, testifying on behalf of the Cannabis Retailers Association of Texas (CRAFT) testified, “Your decision today will mean that future generations to come will thank you for allowing them access to relief readily available through over-the-counter wellness products containing hemp-derived cannabinoids, or, by banning it and handing over the enormous demand to those we are working so hard to stop at our border, creating a black market and empowering future generations of El Chapos.”
This stark warning encapsulated a core message from industry representatives: banning legal hemp-derived THC will not stop demand – it will simply empower criminal organizations and cartel-style illicit traffickers to fill the void, undermining public safety far more than regulated sales ever would.
Multiple industry experts argued that the state can solve youth access issues through technology and training without dismantling the entire hemp market. They emphasized that modern “age-gating” solutions (already used by reputable CBD shops) can electronically verify IDs and block under-21 sales, just as liquor stores or vape shops do. Some industry organizations have been developing standards for age-gating since 2020, well before any legal mandate.
“We’ve built a transparent, regulated industry that protects consumers,” stated one industry representative. “Dismantling it would only benefit illegal operators.” In other words, a ban would drive demand to the black market (where no one asks for ID), whereas enforcing ID checks in legal shops keeps kids out.

Data vs. Fear: Challenging Misleading Claims

Central to Chief Dye’s argument for the ban was that hemp-derived THC poses a growing public safety hazard, evidenced by more kids ending up intoxicated or in emergency rooms. A chief concern raised was a supposed spike in calls to poison control centers due to Delta-8. Dye and a supportive witness, Dr. Matthew Rossheim (a public health professor), both suggested that pediatric exposures were sharply rising. Rossheim claimed Texas has “seen sharp increases in emergency room visits for pediatric poisonings” from these products.
However, industry advocates provided data and context that significantly undercut these claims. They pointed out that reports to poison control have not dramatically increased since Delta-8 entered the market, contrary to the narrative of a crisis. In fact, no one at the hearing could cite evidence of a Texas-specific surge in serious adverse incidents.
Several industry representatives explained that many cases labeled as “poisonings” were actually instances where novice users simply “freaked out” after eating a strong Delta-8 gummy, leading them or their parents to seek help – an anxiety reaction, not a toxic overdose. With proper dosing education, they argued, these incidents are preventable and inherently less dangerous than portrayed.
Furthermore, state officials at the hearing quietly acknowledged that quality-control issues, while real, have been limited in scope. When pressed, a Department of State Health Services expert conceded there have only been a handful of instances of hemp products exceeding the 0.3% THC limit or being mislabeled – “not many and not a significant problem” based on their reports. This directly contradicted Perry’s portrayal of an out-of-control market flooded with potent contraband.

Industry, Patients, and Veterans Push Back

The vast majority of the nearly 170 people who signed up to testify were opposed to SB 3. Business owners, cannabis advocates, veterans, medical patients, and even some healthcare professionals testified that the answer is regulation, not prohibition.
Lukas Gilkey, co-founder of Austin-based Hometown Hero CBD (one of Texas’s largest Delta-8 retailers) and a U.S. Coast Guard veteran, was a prominent witness against the bill. Gilkey emphasized that Texas’s hemp businesses are not underground drug dealers, but licensed retailers contributing to the economy and serving consumers’ needs. By outlawing all THC products, lawmakers would be “pulling the rug out from under” an entire small-business sector that employs around 50,000 Texans and includes 7,000+ licensed shops statewide.
Multiple veterans – some in military uniforms – spoke out to oppose SB 3, emphasizing how accessible hemp-derived THC products have been life-changing for veterans dealing with PTSD, chronic pain, and other service-related injuries. They contrasted the ease of walking into a local shop for a therapeutic gummy with the bureaucratic hassle and expense of Texas’s restrictive Compassionate Use Program (CUP) for medical marijuana.
One emotional moment came when a mother, Piper Lindeen, described how low-THC cannabis kept her epileptic son’s seizures at bay; she pleaded not to take away the only thing giving her child a normal life.
Other witnesses provided pragmatic solutions that directly countered Perry and Dye’s points. Several suggested Texas implement testing and labeling standards (for potency, purity, child-resistant packaging, etc.) similar to states with legal cannabis, rather than ban products outright. Mark Bordas, a hemp business owner, used a memorable analogy: “You don’t cure alcoholism by banning light beer. Hemp is the light beer of cannabis…If Texas has a THC problem, isn’t the source the high-potency marijuana?” His point neatly flipped Perry’s logic, arguing that hemp products are actually a milder alternative to illicit high-THC cannabis.

Regulation vs. Prohibition: A Better Path Forward

Throughout the hearing, industry stakeholders emphasized that they acknowledge the need for tough standards to keep bad actors in check and kids out of harm’s way. They insisted those goals can be met without destroying a legitimate industry and criminalizing countless Texans.
Retailers like Shayda Torabi, co-owner of Restart CBD in Austin, testified that her store strictly age-verifies every purchaser. “As a retailer I am age-gating product sales…Knee-jerk reactions are not the way to eliminate bad actors,” Torabi told senators, urging them to punish those who sell to minors rather than all businesses wholesale.
“If stores around this state are selling to children, it’s the Legislature’s fault for not adding that verbiage into the bill,” said Nicholas Gresham, owner of East Texas Hemp Company, referring to the lack of explicit age restrictions in the original 2019 hemp law.
Multiple advocates stressed that Texas has the capability to regulate sales through common-sense measures – from requiring child-resistant packaging and clear labeling to restricting marketing that targets minors – all without resorting to prohibition. Their testimony underscored the point that responsible businesses already voluntarily enforce age limits, knowing it’s in their best interest to prevent youth access. They urged the committee to codify these practices statewide.

Critical Moments and Outcome

The SB 3 hearing had several flashpoints that illustrated the intensity of this debate. One striking moment came when the audience’s reaction led to the entire Senate gallery being cleared. As multiple witnesses passionately rebuked the ban and defended legal THC, supporters in the gallery clapped and cheered – defying the chairman’s warnings to remain quiet. After a few such outbursts of applause, state troopers were ordered to empty the gallery for roughly 30 minutes. Seasoned advocates noted they had “never seen the full gallery cleared” before. This incident underscored the high emotions on display and the overwhelming sentiment in the room, which appeared to favor regulation over an outright ban.
Another pivotal moment was Sen. Perry’s closing remarks. After hours of being on the defensive, Perry doubled down on his stance and lashed out at the hemp industry as “bad actors clinging to keep their unethical market alive.” Perry’s comparison of the industry to 1950s-era tobacco companies – effectively accusing them of lying about safety – drew murmurs and prompted one final wave of responses from witnesses.
The State Affairs Committee left SB 3 pending without taking an immediate vote – a pause that suggested at least some lawmakers had reservations about rushing forward. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has signaled SB 3 is a fast-track priority, claiming banning Delta-8 will “keep these unsafe products off our streets,” despite evidence that prohibition often does the opposite.

Conclusion: A Crossroads for Texas Cannabis Policy

The hearing made clear that Texas stands at a crossroads on hemp and cannabis policy. On one side, leaders like Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and Sen. Perry are doubling down on a hardline, prohibitionist stance fueled by alarming narratives of public danger. On the other, a growing alliance of entrepreneurs, consumers, patients, and industry advocates are calling for a more nuanced approach.
As one industry representative reminded the senators in closing, “You don’t often get a second chance to avoid a costly mistake,” urging them not to repeat the errors of past drug policy.
Whether the Texas Legislature will heed this call for balance remains to be seen. But for now, the voices of reason – from industry representatives to the everyday Texans who showed up to testify – have made their case loud and clear. Future generations of Texans, they argue, will either thank this legislature for keeping wellness products accessible and safe, or curse it for empowering black markets and “future El Chapos.” The choice lies in lawmakers’ hands, and all of Texas is watching.

Top Ten Prohibitionist Lies

Written by Jay Maguire on March 7, 2025. Posted in Legislative, The Drug War.

The March 3 hearing showcased the best anti-THC talking points from the 1970’s, 80’s and beyond. Like a hit parade of bogus tunes, here’s the Top Ten Prohibitionist Lies

1. “Marijuana is a Gateway Drug”

• Falsehood: Using marijuana leads people to use harder drugs like heroin or meth.

• Reality: Numerous studies, including from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), show no causal link between marijuana use and subsequent hard drug use. The real gateway factors tend to be socioeconomic conditions, trauma, or early exposure to addictive substances like alcohol and nicotine.

2. “Marijuana Causes Violent Crime”

• Falsehood: Legalizing marijuana increases violent crime rates.

• Reality: Crime statistics from states that have legalized cannabis (e.g., Colorado, Washington) show no significant rise in violent crime—and some cities have even reported decreases. In contrast, illegal drug trade violence often decreases when legal markets replace black market sales.

3. “Marijuana Lowers IQ and Makes People Lazy”

• Falsehood: Long-term cannabis use reduces intelligence and destroys motivation.

• Reality: Studies show no significant IQ drop in adults who use cannabis. While adolescent overuse may impact cognitive development, occasional adult use has not been linked to measurable declines in intelligence. Moreover, many successful professionals and creatives openly use cannabis without suffering motivational issues.

4. “Marijuana is as Dangerous as Heroin and Fentanyl”

• Falsehood: Cannabis is a “Schedule I drug” because it’s highly addictive and has no medical benefits.

• Reality: Marijuana is not chemically addictive in the way opioids or nicotine are, and it has established medical benefits for pain, epilepsy, PTSD, and more. In fact, it is far less harmful than alcohol and prescription painkillers.

5. “Legalization Leads to More Teen Use”

• Falsehood: When states legalize marijuana, more teenagers will start using it.

• Reality: Studies from The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and Colorado Department of Public Health show no increase in youth marijuana use post-legalization. In fact, some states have seen decreases in underage use due to better regulation.

6. “Marijuana Kills Brain Cells”

• Falsehood: Smoking weed permanently destroys brain cells.

• Reality: This myth originated from a flawed 1970s study where researchers suffocated monkeys with excessive cannabis smoke, depriving them of oxygen. Modern neuroscience shows that cannabis affects brain function but does not destroy brain cells.

7. “People Overdose on Marijuana”

• Falsehood: Cannabis use leads to lethal overdoses.

• Reality: There are zero recorded deaths from cannabis overdose. While high doses can cause discomfort, anxiety, or nausea, it does not suppress respiratory function like opioids.

8. “Legal Marijuana States Have More DUIs and Traffic Accidents”

• Falsehood: Marijuana legalization leads to more impaired driving and crashes.

• Reality: While THC can impair driving ability in some cases, overall crash rates have not spiked in legal states. Many studies indicate that drunk driving is a far bigger problem than cannabis-impaired driving.

9. “Marijuana Has No Legitimate Medical Use”

• Falsehood: There is no scientific evidence supporting medical marijuana.

• Reality: Cannabis is FDA-approved for multiple conditions, and studies confirm its effectiveness in treating epilepsy (CBD), chronic pain, nausea from chemotherapy, PTSD, and multiple sclerosis. The U.S. government even holds a patent on cannabinoids for their neuroprotective effects.

10. “Marijuana Legalization Harms the Economy”

• Falsehood: Legal weed will damage businesses and hurt the economy.

• Reality: Legal cannabis is one of the fastest-growing industries, generating billions in tax revenue, creating hundreds of thousands of jobs, and reducing costs related to law enforcement

Texas Advocacy for Hemp: Life Rafts vs. Torpedoes

Written by Jay Maguire on February 22, 2025. Posted in Legislative.

 

The Texas Legislature is not kind to perceived bad industries that show division. Lawmakers, especially those in the governing party, are well-practiced in divide-and-rule. When they see infighting, they exploit it. When they see an industry that can’t even align on its own interests, they stop taking it seriously. That is why survival in this fight depends entirely on solidarity.

 
And yet, Bayou City Hemp just made the worst possible mistake. By circulating a flyer in the Capitol calling for a ban on all smokable hemp—without even informing their own trade association leaders—they didn’t just undermine the industry’s collective voice. They handed prohibitionists exactly what they wanted: proof that even we aren’t convinced of our own legitimacy.

It’s as if, seeing the torpedo in the water, Bayou City launched their own life raft, hoping to save themselves before the ship went down. But that’s not how this works. The prohibitionists don’t see them as allies—they see them as easy targets. The second the industry collapses, Bayou City’s raft won’t be spared. It will be machine-gunned like the rest. And in the process, they’ve weakened the entire industry’s argument for reasonable regulation. Instead of presenting a united front to lawmakers, they’ve reinforced the very narrative prohibitionists are pushing—that this is an industry that cannot regulate itself and therefore must be banned altogether.

 

If they truly believed in this course of action, they should have done it the right way—resigning from the board, stating their case within industry discussion groups  and working with the professional advocates and advocacy groups—who are expert at understanding the political landscape, the unwritten rules, and finding ways to win when weaker sisters panic—to find a compromises and creative solutions. For example, the main knock on our industry right now is the largely unproven allegation that we sell and market to kids. While we can all agree that mimicking brands of children cereals and candies is a bad look, there’s no Joe Camel-level duplicity happening here but the narrative is established and refuting it costs more energy than we any benefit we’d derive from engaging in the “I know you are, but what am I?” tropes that so often ensue in similar circumstances.

 

The answer: we’ve been working diligently to identify and refine technologies that make it much less chancy when it comes to age gating—as an upcoming article in Special Legislative issue of the Texas Hemp Reporter will demonstrate, harnessing the power of AI and facial recognition tightens up on the one area of weakness we all admit we have—consistent carding of customers and retail clerks who are 100% compliant and on the ball every single transaction.

 
As you’ll see from the machines, we can show law makers we’ve got it figured out and seek collaboration on areas of alignment, not mindless deflection to other players in industry when we feel out own interests threatened. This is just one example of what Bayou City might have done. Instead, they’ve set the stage for a circular firing squad within the industry, betraying the broader interests they had at least an arguable duty to represent and doing the prohibitionists’ work of undermining credibility for them.
Now is the time for discipline, not desperation. If we want lawmakers to treat this as a mature, responsible industry worthy of negotiation, we need to act like one. Anything less, and we are simply making the case for our own demise.

Hemp Wars: Lt. Dan Marches Senate into Kill-Zone

Written by Jay Maguire on February 21, 2025. Posted in Legislative.

Political Commentary | Jay Maguire – Political Editor Texas Hemp Reporter –
Senate Bill 3, introduced by Senator Charles Perry and backed by Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, represents Texas’ most aggressive crackdown on hemp-derived cannabinoids. The bill would ban all cannabinoids except CBD and CBG, effectively outlawing products containing delta-8 and delta-9 THC, which have flourished due to legal gray areas. Supporters argue that these products pose safety risks, particularly to minors, while opponents see the bill as an unnecessary expansion of government control that would cripple Texas’ legal hemp industry.
But this legislation isn’t just about hemp—it’s part of a broader far-right agenda in Texas, where Patrick and Perry have used their power to push extreme culture war policies. Patrick, in particular, has been instrumental in Texas’ hard-right turn, attacking public education, LGBTQ+ rights, and any form of marijuana legalization under the guise of protecting “traditional values.” This latest push to ban hemp-derived cannabinoids aligns with their long-standing efforts to extend the failed War on Drugs, despite mounting evidence that criminalization doesn’t work.
The financial backing behind this movement is critical to understanding what’s happening. Patrick’s biggest donor, West Texas oil billionaire Tim Dunn, has poured millions into reshaping Texas politics, funding primary challenges against Republicans who aren’t conservative enough. Dunn’s money has fueled attacks on public education, voting rights, and any policy that doesn’t fit his ultra-conservative, Christian nationalist vision for the state. In that context, SB3 isn’t just about hemp—it’s about control. It’s another example of Texas’ political machine prioritizing ideological battles over economic freedom, despite the fact that the hemp industry has created jobs and generated revenue for the state.
If SB3 passes, it will take effect on September 1, 2025, with retailers required to comply by January 1, 2026. But for Patrick and Perry, the bill’s impact goes beyond just shutting down hemp businesses—it’s part of a larger strategy to shape Texas in their far-right image, using the War on Drugs as a tool to maintain power.

Lt. Governor’s Prohibition Push: History Repeats in Texas Hemp Debate

Written by Jay Maguire on December 9, 2024. Posted in Legislative.

 

When Lt. Governor Dan Patrick announced Senate Bill 3 to ban all forms of THC in Texas, he drew from a familiar political playbook. His declaration that “thousands of stores have opened to sell all types of dangerous products with unlimited THC” echoes rhetoric used to justify cannabis prohibition in the 1930s, when claims about “reefer madness” helped drive federal policy.

 

The Texas Hemp Federation, through Executive Director Jay Maguire, responded: “The Lt. Governor’s characterization ignores basic facts about our industry. Legal hemp businesses employing thousands of Texans are providing safe, tested products while generating over a billion dollars in tax revenue. This isn’t about public safety – it’s about politics.”

Patrick’s announcement comes as multiple studies show regulated hemp markets reduce illegal sales and provide safer alternatives for consumers. States with strict regulation rather than prohibition consistently report better outcomes for both public health and law enforcement resources.

 

The timing is particularly notable given recent challenges to the “tough on drugs” political narrative. As more states move toward regulated markets, evidence continues to mount that prohibition creates more problems than it solves. Even traditionally conservative states have begun embracing hemp’s economic benefits while implementing sensible regulations.

 

Law enforcement perspectives have also evolved. Many departments now prefer focusing resources on actually dangerous substances rather than hemp products. Some Texas police chiefs have publicly stated that regulated hemp markets make their jobs easier by clearly distinguishing legal from illegal products.

 

The economic stakes are substantial. Beyond direct revenue and employment, Texas’ hemp industry supports numerous ancillary businesses from agriculture to retail. Local communities across the state have come to depend on hemp-related commerce and tax revenue for essential services.

 

“History teaches us that prohibition doesn’t eliminate demand – it just drives markets underground,” notes the Federation’s statement. “We’ve built a transparent, regulated industry that protects consumers and supports communities. Dismantling it would only benefit illegal operators.”

The proposed ban faces several hurdles, including potential federal preemption under the Farm Bill and likely legal challenges from affected businesses. Previous attempts at administrative prohibition have already been blocked by Texas courts.

 

For now, the industry continues operating under existing regulations while preparing for what promises to be a defining legislative battle. The outcome may well determine whether Texas embraces evidence-based policy or returns to failed strategies of the past.

 

[Note: This article represents ongoing coverage. The Texas Hemp Reporter will continue following developments as this story unfolds.]

 

CenTex CBD Wins Landmark Victory Against Sweet Sensi

Written by Jay Maguire on December 6, 2024. Posted in CBD News & Business, Magazines.

A Travis County jury has issued a unanimous and decisive verdict against Sweet Sensi, awarding CenTex CBD $95,722 in exemplary damages in addition to compensatory damages. The case, which began as a simple $3,400 product complaint, escalated into a contentious two-year legal battle marked by accusations of trade secret theft, allegations of corporate bullying, and questions about ethical practices in the hemp industry.

 

The verdict not only vindicates CenTex CBD but sends a powerful message to manufacturers and legal professionals about the importance of honesty, consumer safety, and accountability. For the Corrigan family, who run the family-owned CenTex CBD, this victory is bittersweet, reflecting the enormous personal and financial toll the litigation took on their lives.

 

From a Quality Complaint to a Two-Year Legal Odyssey

 

In August 2022, the relationship between CenTex CBD and Sweet Sensi—once a promising partnership—collapsed over a shipment of defective gummies. The gummies, coated with green sugar instead of the usual red and containing more than double the labeled Delta-8 THC potency, immediately raised red flags.

 

“When I opened the box, I couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” said Jennifer Gregg, Co-Owner of CenTex CBD. “These weren’t just a little off—they looked like a joke.”

 

Testing confirmed that the gummies were unsafe for sale, and CenTex approached Sweet Sensi to resolve the issue professionally. CenTex expected a simple refund or replacement. Instead, Sweet Sensi terminated their relationship and escalated the matter by filing counterclaims of trade secret theft—a move that would set the stage for two years of grueling litigation.

 

“We were completely blindsided,” said Judy Corrigan, owner of CenTex CBD. “We thought we were working with a trusted partner, but their response felt like an attack on everything we stood for.”

 

The High Stakes of Product Quality and Safety

The defective gummies represented more than just a cosmetic error. In an industry heavily reliant on consumer trust, accurate labeling and potency consistency are paramount. Hemp-derived products like Delta-8 THC gummies require precise dosing to ensure consumer safety, especially given their psychoactive properties.

 

“When we discovered the gummies contained more than double the labeled potency, we knew we couldn’t sell them,” Corrigan explained. “It would have been irresponsible and potentially dangerous.”

 

This safety concern was a central theme throughout the trial, as the jury heard evidence that Sweet Sensi had deviated from standard manufacturing practices without explanation. “We learned that an employee was instructed to use green sugar,” Corrigan said. “Why they did that, we still don’t know. But the bottom line is that the product was defective, and they refused to take responsibility.”

 

The Legal and Ethical Fallout

AI generated courtroom illustration

The case took a dramatic turn when Sweet Sensi’s attorney, Lisa Pittman, faced sanctions for misconduct. Pittman was found to have improperly contacted CenTex’s expert witness, Wyatt Larew, who was also her former client. During sworn testimony, Larew recounted how Pittman attempted to intimidate him, telling him to withdraw and suggesting he “have a contingency plan” in case of arrest.

 

These actions prompted Judge Karin Crump to remind Pittman of her Fifth Amendment rights—a rare and significant moment highlighting the gravity of her behavior. “This isn’t just about an attorney crossing a line,” said one legal observer. “This is about undermining the integrity of the judicial process.”

 

Pittman’s conduct during the trial further undermined Sweet Sensi’s case. She was repeatedly reprimanded for inappropriate behavior, including laughing during testimony and making improper comments. The jury, already skeptical of Sweet Sensi’s claims, appeared further convinced of the company’s bad faith by their attorney’s antics.

 

The Cost of Defending the Truth

 

For the CenTex family, the litigation came at a steep price. Over two years, they faced mounting legal fees, lost business opportunities, and relentless stress. “This lawsuit consumed our lives,” said Adam Gregg, Judy’s son and business partner. “We had to put nearly everything else on hold just to defend ourselves.”

 

The lawsuit also strained the family’s relationships within the hemp industry. “We withdrew from networking and industry events because we assumed people would side with Sweet Sensi,” said Corrigan. “It was isolating.”

 

Employees at CenTex CBD also felt the impact. “We tried to shield them from the worst of it, but they knew what was going on,” Corrigan said. “Their support meant the world to us.”

 

Despite these challenges, the family remained resolute. “We knew we had done nothing wrong,” said Adam Gregg. “We couldn’t let them bully us into submission.”

 

Jury Rejects Sweet Sensi’s Claims

After careful deliberation, the jury delivered a unanimous verdict in favor of CenTex on all counts. They found that Sweet Sensi had engaged in knowing constructive fraud, violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and breached warranty. The awards included:

  • $9,994 for loss of benefit of the bargain
  • $3,400 for out-of-pocket expenses
  • $6,594 for lost profits
  • $95,722 in exemplary damages

 

The exemplary damages—nearly five times the actual damages—were a clear rebuke of Sweet Sensi’s conduct. Under Texas law, such damages are reserved for cases where malice or gross negligence is proven.

 

“We were just trying to resolve a quality issue, and instead we were vilified,” Corrigan said. “The jury saw through the smoke and mirrors and gave us the justice we deserved.”

 

Broader Implications for the Hemp Industry

 

The case has significant implications for the Texas hemp industry, particularly regarding product safety and accountability. Accurate labeling and potency testing are critical in an industry where consumers rely on transparency and consistency.

 

“This wasn’t just about green sugar on gummies,” said Corrigan. “It was about ensuring that consumers can trust what’s on the label.”

 

The jury’s verdict sends a strong message to manufacturers that cutting corners on quality control will not be tolerated. “Testing isn’t optional,” said Adam Gregg. “Companies that ignore safety standards are putting consumers at risk and will face the consequences.”

 

The case also highlights the need for stricter regulatory oversight. “We need clear, enforceable rules around testing and labeling,” said Corrigan. “Without them, companies like Sweet Sensi will continue to operate without accountability.”

 

A Failed PR Campaign

 

In an attempt to sway public opinion, Sweet Sensi launched a media campaign that included a paid advertorial and an open letter accusing CenTex of harming the industry. These efforts, however, backfired.

 

The jury’s findings contradicted Sweet Sensi’s claims, and the company’s attempt to frame itself as a victim only further eroded its credibility. “Their PR strategy was as baseless as their counterclaims,” said Corrigan.

 

Moving Forward: Lessons Learned

 

For CenTex CBD, the verdict is both a vindication and a reminder of the challenges small businesses face in standing up to larger companies. “We learned a lot about the importance of due diligence and the value of integrity,” Corrigan said.

 

The family remains committed to their mission of providing high-quality, safe hemp products. “This experience has been traumatic, but it hasn’t shaken our belief in the potential of this industry,” Corrigan said.

 

A Victory for Ethics and Accountability

 

The Travis County jury’s unanimous verdict represents more than a resolution of a business dispute. It is a reaffirmation of core principles: that consumers deserve safe, accurately labeled products, that manufacturers must be held accountable, and that justice can prevail even in the face of aggressive tactics.

 

“This case wasn’t just about us,” said Corrigan. “It was about standing up for what’s right. And we hope it inspires others to do the same.”

 

This expanded article now includes additional context, quotes, and reflections while deepening the discussion of industry implications and the human cost of the litigation. Let me know if there are specific areas you’d like to expand further!

Drug Warrior Mentality Meets Hemp

Written by Jay Maguire on September 17, 2024. Posted in The Drug War.

The Cost of Outdated Perceptions and Misguided Enforcement

Recent statements by Collin County law enforcement officials regarding THCa products derived from hemp reveal the lingering influence of an outdated “drug warrior” mentality – a relic of the War on Drugs era that continues to skew perceptions of hemp and its derivatives. This clash between old-school thinking and new legal realities has all the hallmarks of a classic moral panic, with devastating consequences for innocent business owners and their communities.

 The Shadows of the War on Drugs

For decades, law enforcement operated under a drug warrior worldview that often led to oversimplified, “us vs. them” thinking. This mentality persists even as laws and scientific understanding evolve, distorting the reality of hemp-derived products. Complex issues are reduced to black-and-white thinking, seen in the blanket categorization of THCa products as “illegal narcotics,” despite their legal status under both federal and Texas law when derived from compliant hemp. Years of viewing all cannabis-related substances as inherently dangerous leads to automatic assumptions about new products, unsupported by current evidence.

 The nuanced legal landscape, with careful delineations between hemp and marijuana based on THC content, requires a more sophisticated understanding that old-school drug warrior thinking struggles to accommodate. Amplifying potential dangers to create urgency was a hallmark of drug war rhetoric. This is evident in the inflammatory language used to describe THCa products and their effects, often without solid evidence. The instinct to respond with increased enforcement and criminalization overlooks more effective harm reduction strategies and the potential benefits of regulation over prohibition.

Moral Panic in Action

These biases fuel what sociologists term a “moral panic” – an exaggerated societal reaction to a perceived threat. Key elements of this panic are evident in the officials’ statements. Claims of THC percentages as high as 78% likely stem from flawed testing methods. Accurate testing of THCa requires high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), not the gas chromatography methods that can decarboxylate THCa during testing, inflating THC percentages.

Dire warnings about future harm, particularly to youth, ignore the industry’s age verification efforts and lack supporting evidence. Terms like “illegal narcotics” and comparisons to dangerous drugs like K2 and opioids symbolically link legal hemp products to illicit substances. The hemp industry and consumers are portrayed as threatening “folk devils,” with loaded language implying intentional harm to youth.

A united front implies widespread agreement about the danger, despite significant legal and scientific disagreement. Calls for prohibition and strict enforcement appear disproportionate to any demonstrated harm from legal hemp products. The sudden intensity of concern, despite these products being on the market for years, reflects the volatile nature of moral panics.

This rhetoric eerily echoes the “Reefer Madness” era, when exaggerated claims about marijuana led to decades of harmful prohibition. Learning from history is crucial to avoid repeating such mistakes. 

The Human Cost of Misguided Enforcement

 The recent raids on hemp businesses in Collin County have inflicted significant harm on innocent business owners and their communities. These actions, based on misunderstandings of law and flawed testing methods, have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond mere financial losses.

When law enforcement wrongly raids a store, the impact on business owners is severe and multifaceted. Financial devastation can occur as seized inventory and cash potentially cripple a small business, leading to permanent closure. Even if charges are eventually dropped, the immediate loss of income can be insurmountable. The fear of prosecution looms large, even when owners have operated in good faith. Legal fees and the stress of potential criminal charges take a heavy toll.

Raids can tarnish a business’s reputation, leading to loss of customers and strained relationships with neighbors. The stigma associated with a police raid can linger long after the legal issues are resolved. The stress of legal troubles and financial insecurity can put immense pressure on family relationships, potentially leading to lasting damage.

Business owners often experience anxiety, depression, and PTSD-like symptoms in the aftermath of a raid (such is the case with Hunter Robinson who was raided in Navarro County).  The sudden loss of security and stability can be profoundly traumatizing. These actions can shatter business owners’ trust in law enforcement and the legal system, leading to a sense of vulnerability and isolation.

This heavy-handed approach is particularly troubling given that shop owners rely on certificates of analysis from accredited laboratories to verify the legality of their products. These business owners do not deserve such overbearing treatment when they have taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance with the law.

 Moving Beyond Panic

Recognizing these biases is crucial for developing effective, reality-based policies around hemp products. A new paradigm is needed that acknowledges the legal status of hemp and its derivatives, bases decisions on current scientific evidence, focuses on responsible regulation rather than blanket criminalization, recognizes the economic potential of the hemp industry, and prioritizes education and harm reduction over fear-mongering.

A more appropriate approach to addressing concerns about potentially controversial products would involve open dialogue between law enforcement, regulators, and business owners to clarify legal standards and expectations. Educational outreach to help businesses understand and comply with relevant laws and regulations is essential. Clear guidelines on product testing and documentation should be established to ensure consistency and reliability. A gradual enforcement approach that begins with warnings and opportunities for correction before resorting to raids and seizures would be more just and effective.

Industry Response and Action

The hemp industry recognizes the importance of addressing concerns and demonstrating a commitment to responsible practices. Actions are being taken on multiple fronts, including pursuing legal clarification through the courts, engaging with state lawmakers to develop clear, science-based regulations, and implementing industry self-regulation measures such as strict age-gating practices and standardized testing protocols.

The goal is to create a robust regulatory framework that ensures product safety and consumer protection while allowing the hemp industry to thrive. All stakeholders are invited to join in this effort to move beyond fear-based reactions and towards evidence-based policies that serve the public interest.

By adopting a more measured and collaborative approach, law enforcement can address legitimate concerns without inflicting unnecessary harm on law-abiding business owners and their communities. This would foster a climate of trust and cooperation, rather than fear and antagonism, ultimately serving the best interests of public safety and economic stability. It’s time for a new era of understanding and cooperation between law enforcement, the hemp industry, and the public they all serve.

Allen TX Raids Spark Controversy

Written by Jay Maguire on September 5, 2024. Posted in News. 1 Comment on Allen TX Raids Spark Controversy

Hemp Industry in Allen, Texas Under Fire: Recent
Raids Spark Controversy

The hemp industry in Allen, Texas is facing a significant challenge following a series of raids
conducted by local law enforcement on several hemp retailers. On Aug. 27, the Allen
Police Department targeted nine out of 25 hemp retailers in the city, all of whom were members of
the 10-member Allen Hemp Coalition. This selective approach has ignited a heated debate
about the legality of certain hemp-derived products and the methods employed by law
enforcement.

Images: AJ Velador ( HILT)

AJ Velador, Founder of Hemp Industry Leaders of Texas (HILT), has spoken out forcefully
against these raids, describing them as not merely an attack on law-abiding businesses; they
represent a dangerous erosion of our democratic values and the rule of law.
The timing of these raids is particularly controversial, coming shortly after recent legal victories
where Allen business owners successfully quashed DEA subpoenas and prevailed in court. This
sequence of events has led to accusations of retaliation. Critics argue that the selective
targeting suggests unfair retaliation against recent legal triumphs, emphasizing that in America,
we are governed by the rule of law, not arbitrary police action.

The businesses affected by the raids claim they have been operating within the bounds of the
law, selling hemp-derived products that they believe to be legal under current regulations. These
establishments are described as pillars of their communities, run by respectable, family-oriented
entrepreneurs pursuing the American dream. Many assert that they have diligently complied
with all applicable laws and regulations, even implementing voluntary age restrictions and other
responsible practices that exceed legal requirements.


However, local law enforcement appears to have a different interpretation of the law, particularly
concerning the THC content of these products. Industry advocates point out a potential
misunderstanding in the application of the law, particularly regarding the reliance on total THC
measurements rather than the legally relevant Delta 9 THC content.
The raids have resulted in the seizure of products and, in some cases, arrests of business
owners and employees. This has created significant economic hardship for the affected
businesses and raised concerns about due process and the appropriate use of law enforcement
resources.

The situation has created tension between the hemp industry and local law enforcement.
Industry representatives argue that they have been proactive in self-regulation and have sought
to work collaboratively with authorities to establish clear guidelines. HILT and its predecessor
organizations have advocated for sensible regulation, including age restrictions, since 2019.
In response to the raids, industry leaders have called on Allen Police Chief Steve Dye to cease
these actions, return all seized property to the business owners and engage in a cordial
discussion to reach a peaceful resolution. They are urging lawmakers to engage with them in
crafting legislation that protects consumers while allowing legal businesses to operate without
fear of persecution.

As the controversy unfolds, both sides are preparing for potential legal battles. The outcome of
this conflict could have far-reaching implications for the hemp industry not only in Allen but
potentially across Texas and beyond. The industry maintains that the products in question are
legal, hemp-derived cannabinoids that serve crucial wellness purposes for countless Texans.
Velador emphasizes the broader implications of these actions: In a free society, disagreements
are settled in courts and legislatures, not through police raids and intimidation. The actions of
the Allen police are not just an assault on these businesses; they are an affront to the values
that define us as Texans and as Americans.

As the legal process unfolds, HILT is taking action to support the affected businesses. They are
currently raising funds for the legal defense of those arrested during the raids. Those interested
in supporting this effort can contribute through the following GoFundMe link:

This ongoing situation underscores the complex and often contentious relationship between
emerging industries, existing laws, and law enforcement interpretation. As the hemp industry
continues to evolve, it is clear that clearer regulations and better communication between all
stakeholders will be crucial to avoid similar conflicts in the future.

TX Banning Delta-8 THC?

Written by Jay Maguire on June 3, 2024. Posted in News.

In a pivotal move this week, the Texas Senate State Affairs Committee convened to explore potential pathways for banning Delta-8 THC, following a directive from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. The hearing laid bare a host of issues that have thrust this hemp-derived compound into the eye of a growing storm.

Given its current legal status in Texas under the temporary injunction in the Sky Marketing case, Delta-8 THC products have become ubiquitous, which some witnesses said foster a dangerous misconception among consumers who believe they are purchasing a safe, regulated product. This situation stands in stark contrast to other states, even conservative ones, that have established comprehensive medical cannabis programs. Law enforcement finds itself in a quandary, as current technology struggles to distinguish between legal hemp and illegal cannabis products.

While cannabis earns praise for its superior efficacy in managing nerve pain compared to traditional medications, Delta-8 THC raises red flags, particularly concerning children’s health. A troubling surge in pediatric cases involving accidental ingestion has resulted in severe health issues. Experts and activists also sounded alarm bells about the potential for psychosis, especially among chronic users and children, underscoring the urgent need for stringent safety measures.

The hearing exposed gaping holes in the current regulatory framework. Many manufacturers self-report certificates of analysis, a practice that often leads to inaccurate product labeling. Enforcement is largely hamstrung, limited to food safety violations and products exceeding the 0.3% Delta 9 THC threshold. The state’s lack of jurisdiction over out-of-state labs further muddies the waters of quality control.

Ironically, the proliferation of Delta-8 THC is undermining Texas’s own highly restricted medical cannabis program. These products, which navigate fewer regulatory hurdles, are more affordable and accessible, causing a worrying decline in the state’s patient base. An influx of out-of-state products further complicates the market, making regulation an increasingly uphill battle.

A particularly disquieting issue is the proximity of Delta-8 THC sales in proximity to schools and other child-centric areas. This accessibility, paired with the alarming rise in accidental ingestion cases among children, has ratcheted up public safety concerns. Advocates are pushing for stricter regulations on packaging and marketing to prevent these products from appealing to minors.

In response to these challenges, the committee is weighing several consequential actions. They are considering revising Delta-8’s legal status to align with other states’ medical cannabis frameworks, enhancing product testing and certification standards, and bolstering enforcement mechanisms and of course, banning it outright. Additionally, they’re looking at regulating the influx of out-of-state products, launching targeted public health initiatives to protect children, and establishing proximity restrictions near schools.

Looking ahead, the committee plans to gather more data on Delta-8’s public health impact and engage a broad spectrum of stakeholders. Law enforcement, medical professionals, and industry representatives will all have a seat at the table as Texas works to forge a consensus on these critical changes. As the Lone Star State grapples with this complex issue, its decisions could reverberate across the nation, influencing the future of cannabis regulation in America.

  • 1
  • 2
Nick Mortillaro and Shaun Salvaja talk with Rachel and Russ about the language in the House adaptation of SB3. It is initially not a good looking bill for fans of Smokable Hemp.

And reads as though HB28 has turned into SB3 for the time being. Next the full House of Representatives will vote on the bill.

We urge you to reach out to your congressman and say NO TO SB3!

We need education for lawmakers to understand the industry better before rushing to push the laws banning these products and an industry.


#txhempshow #media #podcast #radio #magazine #blazednews #health

www.texashempreporter.com
www.BlazedNews.com

Nick Mortillaro and Shaun Salvaja talk with Rachel and Russ about the language in the House adaptation of SB3. It is initially not a good looking bill for fans of Smokable Hemp.

And reads as though HB28 has turned into SB3 for the time being. Next the full House of Representatives will vote on the bill.

We urge you to reach out to your congressman and say NO TO SB3!

We need education for lawmakers to understand the industry better before rushing to push the laws banning these products and an industry.


#txhempshow #media #podcast #radio #magazine #blazednews #health

www.texashempreporter.com
www.BlazedNews.com

19

YouTube Video VVVZQ3R0UjVRNEtJVVR5aV9VVmR2Y1dnLkVETEpodWhLeEE0

Is SB3 Now HB28? Moves to House for Vote

Blazed Weekly News May 2, 2025 12:44 am

Today's panel features Cynthia Cabrera and Mark Bordas with the Texas Hemp Business Council... the two discuss policy expectations and legislative movement within the language of several bills that are up for review in the house.

the open discussion with Russell and Mark and Cynthia is informative and eye-opening as the panel discusses federal law, Texas law, and the battle between the states rights against big alcohol, big Pharma, and multi-state operators.

38 Days left in the 89th Legislative session. 

#espnaustin 
#printisnotdead 
#magazine 
#podcast 

#txhempshow

Today's panel features Cynthia Cabrera and Mark Bordas with the Texas Hemp Business Council... the two discuss policy expectations and legislative movement within the language of several bills that are up for review in the house.

the open discussion with Russell and Mark and Cynthia is informative and eye-opening as the panel discusses federal law, Texas law, and the battle between the states rights against big alcohol, big Pharma, and multi-state operators.

38 Days left in the 89th Legislative session.

#espnaustin
#printisnotdead
#magazine
#podcast

#txhempshow

9 0

YouTube Video VVVZQ3R0UjVRNEtJVVR5aV9VVmR2Y1dnLjFJRGIyMDljaHBB

Cynthia Cabrera & Mark Bordas: Legislative Update 89th Legislative Session

Blazed Weekly News April 25, 2025 1:57 am

April - 420 Show - Live Gruene Botanicals San Antonio

April 21, 2025 • 59 mins
Live from central SA TX at Gruene Botanicals, with food, graffiti, infused drinks, a smoke box , live DJ and more . . .
We podcast record this weeks show from the parking lot on Hildebrand with Sean and James.

Sean owns 4 locations of Gruene Botanicals while James owns 3GCC, both are loyal sponsors of the show and we all got together
on the Saturday before Easter/420 for an event that celebrates the culture of this wonderful plant.

PODCAST # 213 LIVE EVENT!

Check them both out here:
https://www.gruenebotanicals.com/
https://www.3gccllc.com/
 

Our Show Page:
https://www.1027espn.com/show/blazed-weekly-news/

to sponsor the show email: 
blazednewz@gmail.com

April - 420 Show - Live Gruene Botanicals San Antonio

April 21, 2025 • 59 mins
Live from central SA TX at Gruene Botanicals, with food, graffiti, infused drinks, a smoke box , live DJ and more . . .
We podcast record this weeks show from the parking lot on Hildebrand with Sean and James.

Sean owns 4 locations of Gruene Botanicals while James owns 3GCC, both are loyal sponsors of the show and we all got together
on the Saturday before Easter/420 for an event that celebrates the culture of this wonderful plant.

PODCAST # 213 LIVE EVENT!

Check them both out here:
https://www.gruenebotanicals.com/
https://www.3gccllc.com/


Our Show Page:
https://www.1027espn.com/show/blazed-weekly-news/

to sponsor the show email:
[email protected]

6 0

YouTube Video VVVZQ3R0UjVRNEtJVVR5aV9VVmR2Y1dnLnVCWFRlTXIzMUww

420 Show - Gruene Botanicals San Antonio

Blazed Weekly News April 22, 2025 9:05 pm

part 2 of the interview with Patrick King this week's show had to be breaking up into two different intervals

part 2 of the interview with Patrick King this week's show had to be breaking up into two different intervals

5 0

YouTube Video VVVZQ3R0UjVRNEtJVVR5aV9VVmR2Y1dnLlA1NWcxT3BBclpN

The Soil King.. Part 2

Blazed Weekly News April 14, 2025 2:11 am

Load More... Subscribe

Read MAY 2025 Issue

LEAFLY

Study finds legal cannabis promotes more physical activity
15 May 2025 - Emily Earlenbaugh

It’s time to throw out the lazy stoner myth. Yet [...]

Why only cannabis from the NSLC meets Nova Scotians’ high…
14 May 2025 - Leafly Staff

With regulated cannabis from the NSLC, you can rely on [...]

Product Picks for this Memorial Day Weekend
13 May 2025 - Anna Elliott

Find the best products for Memorial Day Weekend. Leafly found [...]

Cannabis Industry Journal

STIIIZY Expands by Opening 44th Retail Store
8 April 2025 - Rick Biros

The STIIIZY Hawthorne grand opening marks the company’s ninth retail store [...]

Positioning Cannabis Companies for Success in 2025: Navigating Risks and…
27 March 2025 - Rick Biros

The cannabis sector faces a multifaceted landscape marked by economic challenges, [...]

Hemp Today

Brazil suspends hemp rulemaking despite Supreme Court deadline to regulate
16 May 2025 - HempToday®

In a sudden and unexplained move, Brazil’s health agency this [...]

Study shows how compaction direction affects performance in preformed hemp…
14 May 2025 - HempToday®

The way you press hemp hurd into blocks can make [...]

Report shows hemp fiber sector upbeat despite structural and market…
12 May 2025 - HempToday®

North America’s hemp fiber processing sector remains overwhelmingly optimistic despite [...]

Ganjapreneur

Thousands of Oklahoma Cannabis Licenses Mistakenly Canceled Due to Software…
- Graham Abbott

The Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority (OMMA) acknowledged in a Facebook [...]

Alabama Gov. Signs Hemp Restrictions Bill Into Law
- Graham Abbott

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R) on Wednesday signed into law [...]

CannaCon is Coming to Rochester: Premier Cannabis B2B Expo Set…
- Ganjapreneur

Rochester, NY — May 7, 2025 — CannaCon, one of [...]

©2025 Texas Hemp Reporter LLC

1104 S. Mays Ave # 208 • Round Rock TX 78664 • 512-387-3377 • 512-897-7823 • [email protected]